Fundamental Values

What is the fundamental constant^{1(Sec. 3.1)}; what are the fundamental measures^{1(Sec. 3.2)} and why do either exist?^{2(Eq. 102)} Measurement quantization has revealed that many of the constants of nature may be reduced such that they consist of only the fundamental measures and/or the fundamental constant.^{3(Eqs. 30-34)} The CQP Group seeks to continue the work of breaking down the known constants into a nomenclature consisting of only the fundamental measures,^{3(Eqs. 12-14)} thus providing a consistent framework for describing nature.

Also, under investigation is the nature of self-referencing systems^{1 (Sec. 3.8)} and how such systems lead to invariant relations from the observer's point-of-view.^{1 (Eq. 67)} For instance, do all self-referencing systems lead to self-referencing measures,^{1 (Eq. 47)} discrete measurement bounds and bounded relations?^{1 (Eqs. 27-29)} Why are there three measures,^{2 (Eq. 102)} a specific number of constants and is there also a specific set of bounded relations?^{2 (Sec. 3.9)} Further research promises answers to these questions and to lead to a greater understanding of our universe as a class of possible universes.

There is also specific inquiry into measure itself. What is it?^{2 (Sec. 3.7)} Why is it constrained? Does it vary and if we were in a class of universe with a different rate of expansion, a different correlation between the fundamental measures, what would that look like?

Finally, an understanding of the fundamental measures^{3 (Sec. 2.2)} lends to and provides the foundation to a resultant system that defines the availability of information.^{2 (Sec. 3.8)} What types of information are permitted in a class of universe? How does a model of information based on measurement quantization differ from that of quantum mechanics? Where information is missing, are behaviors like those observed in quantum experiments also observed macroscopically? ^{3 (Sec. 5.3)}

Mapping the relations between quantum and macro phenomenon provide a new approach to understanding how information defines and governs the behavior of matter.^{3 (Ex. Sec. 5.5)} The concept that bounded measure in turn constrains information which in turn defines the behavior of matter is new.^{3 (Fig. 5)} MQ opens the door to a new understanding of the laws of physics, not as absolute rules of nature, but as outcomes to the availability of information in the quantum and macroscopic environment.^1,2,3 While quantum behavior is rarely identified in macro environments, MQ demonstrates a new set of rules applicable to the entire measurement domain. ^{3 (Sec. 2.4)}

Objectives

• Continuing to express all the known constants in terms of only the fundamental measures^{1(Sec. 3.2)} and/or the fundamental constant.^{1(Sec. 3.1)}
• Continued classification of the laws of nature into two groups: self-referencing and self-defining^{1(Sec. 3.8)} (the latter being a property of the universe).
• Continued research demonstrating that the behavior of matter is directly correlated to the availablity of information in the environment.^{2(Sec. 3.8)}

Inquiry

• Such that discrete measure is an outcome of bounds to measure,^{1(Eqs. 27-29)} can non-discrete measure exist?
• Can a system of three self-referencing measures^{1(Eq. 47)} have more than three physically significant dimensions?

Supporting Research

• Fundamental Constant
• Gravitational Constant
• Planck’s Constant
• Hubble’s Constant
• The Gravitational Constant in Quantized Form
• Frames of Reference
• Fundamental Measures
• Physical Significance of Measure
• Fundamental Expression